<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 488 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800545</link>
    <description>Section 129DD permits a revisional authority to annul or modify an appellate order and, absent an express restriction, to remit the matter for fresh adjudication. Revisional review may address overlooked material, unsupported findings, and legal unsustainability without undertaking a wholesale appellate reassessment. In seized-gold matters, Section 123 places the burden of proving lawful, non-smuggled character on the possessor or claimant. A remand does not itself determine confiscation or redemption. Separate notice is unnecessary unless enhanced penalty or redemption fine, or confiscation of higher-value goods, is proposed. Limitation depends on proof of communication of the appellate order and timely objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 488 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800545</link>
      <description>Section 129DD permits a revisional authority to annul or modify an appellate order and, absent an express restriction, to remit the matter for fresh adjudication. Revisional review may address overlooked material, unsupported findings, and legal unsustainability without undertaking a wholesale appellate reassessment. In seized-gold matters, Section 123 places the burden of proving lawful, non-smuggled character on the possessor or claimant. A remand does not itself determine confiscation or redemption. Separate notice is unnecessary unless enhanced penalty or redemption fine, or confiscation of higher-value goods, is proposed. Limitation depends on proof of communication of the appellate order and timely objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>