<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 489 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800546</link>
    <description>Interest on integrated goods and services tax levied on imports under the Customs Tariff Act requires an express charging provision. For imports made from October 2017 to March 2018, neither the Customs Tariff Act nor the Customs Act authorised interest on that levy. Collection of such interest without statutory authority was therefore impermissible, supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 489 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800546</link>
      <description>Interest on integrated goods and services tax levied on imports under the Customs Tariff Act requires an express charging provision. For imports made from October 2017 to March 2018, neither the Customs Tariff Act nor the Customs Act authorised interest on that levy. Collection of such interest without statutory authority was therefore impermissible, supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>