<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800551</link>
    <description>Binding interim judicial directions restraining tax deduction at source on LFC reimbursements prevent a deductor from being treated as an assessee in default for complying with those directions, even where the reimbursements are later held substantively taxable. The employees&#039; substantive tax liability remains unaffected. Such compelled, bona fide compliance constitutes reasonable cause, precluding penalties for failure to deduct tax. Institutional approval processes, personnel changes and e-filing access difficulties may constitute sufficient cause for condoning delayed penalty appeals where there is no deliberate delay, mala fides, prejudice to Revenue, or surviving underlying withholding demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 494 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800551</link>
      <description>Binding interim judicial directions restraining tax deduction at source on LFC reimbursements prevent a deductor from being treated as an assessee in default for complying with those directions, even where the reimbursements are later held substantively taxable. The employees&#039; substantive tax liability remains unaffected. Such compelled, bona fide compliance constitutes reasonable cause, precluding penalties for failure to deduct tax. Institutional approval processes, personnel changes and e-filing access difficulties may constitute sufficient cause for condoning delayed penalty appeals where there is no deliberate delay, mala fides, prejudice to Revenue, or surviving underlying withholding demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>