<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54386</link>
    <description>Contractually stipulated demurrage, wharfage and stock loss charges under a high seas sale agreement form part of the price actually paid or payable for customs valuation purposes when they are expressly agreed as conditions of sale and pre-determined in the contract. Such amounts are not treated as excluded post-importation expenses where they arise from the sale structure itself and are added under the transaction value rules. Earlier authority excluding demurrage was distinguished because it concerned extraordinary port-delay charges, not contractual charges embedded in the high seas sale price. These charges were therefore includible in the assessable value of the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54386</link>
      <description>Contractually stipulated demurrage, wharfage and stock loss charges under a high seas sale agreement form part of the price actually paid or payable for customs valuation purposes when they are expressly agreed as conditions of sale and pre-determined in the contract. Such amounts are not treated as excluded post-importation expenses where they arise from the sale structure itself and are added under the transaction value rules. Earlier authority excluding demurrage was distinguished because it concerned extraordinary port-delay charges, not contractual charges embedded in the high seas sale price. These charges were therefore includible in the assessable value of the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>