<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 519 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800576</link>
    <description>Section 144C applies where an Assessing Officer proposes a variation in returned income through a draft assessment order on or after 1 October 2009, irrespective of the assessment year. For a remand requiring fresh adjudication by the DRP rather than consequential action, the fresh-assessment limitation falls under section 153(2A). Where a fresh transfer-pricing reference is made, the fourth proviso allows two years, running from departmental receipt or knowledge of the appellate order; internal movement or delayed receipt by the particular DRP does not defer it. Section 144C(13) regulates orders following DRP directions but does not displace section 153(2A)&#039;s limitation, rendering proceedings after expiry unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 519 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800576</link>
      <description>Section 144C applies where an Assessing Officer proposes a variation in returned income through a draft assessment order on or after 1 October 2009, irrespective of the assessment year. For a remand requiring fresh adjudication by the DRP rather than consequential action, the fresh-assessment limitation falls under section 153(2A). Where a fresh transfer-pricing reference is made, the fourth proviso allows two years, running from departmental receipt or knowledge of the appellate order; internal movement or delayed receipt by the particular DRP does not defer it. Section 144C(13) regulates orders following DRP directions but does not displace section 153(2A)&#039;s limitation, rendering proceedings after expiry unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>