<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 564 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800621</link>
    <description>Writ challenge to GST summons seeking information and documents was premature where the petitioner had supplied relevant records by representation. No coercive recovery, threat of arrest, or adverse order had arisen from the summons. Judicial interference was therefore unwarranted at that stage in the absence of those circumstances during the GST proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 564 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800621</link>
      <description>Writ challenge to GST summons seeking information and documents was premature where the petitioner had supplied relevant records by representation. No coercive recovery, threat of arrest, or adverse order had arisen from the summons. Judicial interference was therefore unwarranted at that stage in the absence of those circumstances during the GST proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>