<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 224 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54376</link>
    <description>Technical know-how fee contractually integrated with the supply and performance of imported plant and equipment was held includible, to the relatable extent, in the assessable value where the fee formed part of a single commercial package and was payable as a condition connected with sale. The document also notes that, because the bills of entry were provisionally assessed, the extended limitation under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act was not invocable in the manner proposed for reassessment. A bona fide valuation dispute did not by itself establish suppression or misdeclaration, so confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 224 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54376</link>
      <description>Technical know-how fee contractually integrated with the supply and performance of imported plant and equipment was held includible, to the relatable extent, in the assessable value where the fee formed part of a single commercial package and was payable as a condition connected with sale. The document also notes that, because the bills of entry were provisionally assessed, the extended limitation under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act was not invocable in the manner proposed for reassessment. A bona fide valuation dispute did not by itself establish suppression or misdeclaration, so confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>