<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2224 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472322</link>
    <description>Estimated project-profit additions require rejection of regularly maintained accounts or cogent evidence that declared results are unreliable. An ad hoc estimate based on land, construction and overhead costs, comparison with a materially different project, and unsupported site enquiries could not displace audited accounts where no discrepancy was established under Section 145. Differences in project location, duration and treatment of partners&#039; interest also made the profitability comparison unreliable. The reconciled cash-book discrepancy and unrecorded site enquiries provided no evidentiary basis for estimation; deletion of the addition was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2224 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472322</link>
      <description>Estimated project-profit additions require rejection of regularly maintained accounts or cogent evidence that declared results are unreliable. An ad hoc estimate based on land, construction and overhead costs, comparison with a materially different project, and unsupported site enquiries could not displace audited accounts where no discrepancy was established under Section 145. Differences in project location, duration and treatment of partners&#039; interest also made the profitability comparison unreliable. The reconciled cash-book discrepancy and unrecorded site enquiries provided no evidentiary basis for estimation; deletion of the addition was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>