<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1878 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472327</link>
    <description>Delayed furnishing of Form 10B does not by itself defeat exemption under section 11 where the audit report was available to the CPC before return processing under section 143(1). The prescribed filing timeline is procedural and directory, and availability of the report before processing constitutes substantial compliance. Rejection of a delay-condonation request under section 119(2)(b) does not extinguish the appellate remedy for the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:44:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1878 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472327</link>
      <description>Delayed furnishing of Form 10B does not by itself defeat exemption under section 11 where the audit report was available to the CPC before return processing under section 143(1). The prescribed filing timeline is procedural and directory, and availability of the report before processing constitutes substantial compliance. Rejection of a delay-condonation request under section 119(2)(b) does not extinguish the appellate remedy for the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>