https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54373 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that rejected the refund claim based on the unjust enrichment principle. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that the duty incidence was not passed on to the buyers as required under the law. The Tribunal distinguished this case from previous judgments and concluded that the appellants met the criteria for a refund. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:33:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54373 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that rejected the refund claim based on the unjust enrichment principle. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that the duty incidence was not passed on to the buyers as required under the law. The Tribunal distinguished this case from previous judgments and concluded that the appellants met the criteria for a refund. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54373