<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 221 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants a full waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty demand amounting to Rs. 2,52,17,948 for imported parts of cellular phones. It held that the assessment could not be reopened without challenging the original order and found that the appellants had a strong prima facie case on merits. The stay application was allowed, preventing the Revenue from recovering the disputed amount until the appeal&#039;s disposal, and an out-of-turn hearing was scheduled due to the substantial amount involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 221 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellants a full waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty demand amounting to Rs. 2,52,17,948 for imported parts of cellular phones. It held that the assessment could not be reopened without challenging the original order and found that the appellants had a strong prima facie case on merits. The stay application was allowed, preventing the Revenue from recovering the disputed amount until the appeal&#039;s disposal, and an out-of-turn hearing was scheduled due to the substantial amount involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>