<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 337 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54360</link>
    <description>The appeals were filed against the Order-in-Original confirming the amount involved in three show cause notices. The Tribunal held that the demands were time-barred as the show cause notices were issued beyond the 5-year limit. The Tribunal found that the Appellants had disclosed information about the charges to the Revenue Department, and the Revenue failed to prove deliberate withholding of information. The extended period of limitation was not applicable to the Revenue, and the appeals were allowed on the point of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 337 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54360</link>
      <description>The appeals were filed against the Order-in-Original confirming the amount involved in three show cause notices. The Tribunal held that the demands were time-barred as the show cause notices were issued beyond the 5-year limit. The Tribunal found that the Appellants had disclosed information about the charges to the Revenue Department, and the Revenue failed to prove deliberate withholding of information. The extended period of limitation was not applicable to the Revenue, and the appeals were allowed on the point of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>