<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 452 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800509</link>
    <description>Interest on an investigation deposit is payable from the date of deposit until the date of refund where the underlying demand is set aside. Once the demand ceased to be payable from inception, the retained amount was not lawfully due. Dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s subsequent challenge did not justify withholding the refunded amount without interest during the period of retention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:30:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 452 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800509</link>
      <description>Interest on an investigation deposit is payable from the date of deposit until the date of refund where the underlying demand is set aside. Once the demand ceased to be payable from inception, the retained amount was not lawfully due. Dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s subsequent challenge did not justify withholding the refunded amount without interest during the period of retention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>