<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 392 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800449</link>
    <description>Exclusive liquor-branding and display arrangements constituted taxable promotional activity rather than trading margins, with service-tax liability limited to the normal limitation period. Separately invoiced food and beverages supplied to hotel rooms did not fall within restaurant service because rooms were not restaurant premises and the supplies constituted sale or transfer of goods. Electricity charges recovered from tenants at actual sub-metered consumption and remitted to suppliers were not consideration for renting services and could not be included in taxable value as reimbursement. Extended recovery was unavailable where the notice did not invoke the statutory proviso and no wilful suppression or intent to evade tax was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 392 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800449</link>
      <description>Exclusive liquor-branding and display arrangements constituted taxable promotional activity rather than trading margins, with service-tax liability limited to the normal limitation period. Separately invoiced food and beverages supplied to hotel rooms did not fall within restaurant service because rooms were not restaurant premises and the supplies constituted sale or transfer of goods. Electricity charges recovered from tenants at actual sub-metered consumption and remitted to suppliers were not consideration for renting services and could not be included in taxable value as reimbursement. Extended recovery was unavailable where the notice did not invoke the statutory proviso and no wilful suppression or intent to evade tax was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>