<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 398 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54356</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal in a dispute over the reduced price of an imported vessel. The Tribunal held that without a provision for price variation in the Memorandum of agreement, the reduction in price post-import was not sustainable. Despite the appellants&#039; argument that they paid the reduced price as agreed, the Tribunal found no merit in their claim due to the absence of provisions for price variation in the agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 398 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54356</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal in a dispute over the reduced price of an imported vessel. The Tribunal held that without a provision for price variation in the Memorandum of agreement, the reduction in price post-import was not sustainable. Despite the appellants&#039; argument that they paid the reduced price as agreed, the Tribunal found no merit in their claim due to the absence of provisions for price variation in the agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>