<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800474</link>
    <description>CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 assigned assessment jurisdiction over non-corporate assessees reporting income at or above the prescribed metropolitan-city threshold to a Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner. Where an Income-tax Officer issued a reassessment notice despite lacking that allocated jurisdiction, the notice was jurisdictionally defective. The defect was not curable, rendering the reassessment proceedings and consequential assessment invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800474</link>
      <description>CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 assigned assessment jurisdiction over non-corporate assessees reporting income at or above the prescribed metropolitan-city threshold to a Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner. Where an Income-tax Officer issued a reassessment notice despite lacking that allocated jurisdiction, the notice was jurisdictionally defective. The defect was not curable, rendering the reassessment proceedings and consequential assessment invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>