<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 436 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800493</link>
    <description>Omission of Rule 96(10) without a savings or sunset clause prevents its continued application to pending refund proceedings. The governing principle for omitted subordinate legislation requires express transitional preservation before an omitted rule can sustain pending action. A recommendation that the omission operate prospectively was advisory and did not retain the refund restriction. Refund claims therefore cannot be denied by keeping Rule 96(10) alive after its omission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 436 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800493</link>
      <description>Omission of Rule 96(10) without a savings or sunset clause prevents its continued application to pending refund proceedings. The governing principle for omitted subordinate legislation requires express transitional preservation before an omitted rule can sustain pending action. A recommendation that the omission operate prospectively was advisory and did not retain the refund restriction. Refund claims therefore cannot be denied by keeping Rule 96(10) alive after its omission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>