<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 441 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800498</link>
    <description>Challenges to a demand based on limitation, jurisdiction, and the clubbing of different financial years require adjudication through the statutory appellate remedy where they raise disputed questions of fact and law. Writ jurisdiction was not used to determine the merits, and all legal issues remained open for appellate consideration. Protection against coercive action continued until the statutory appeal attained finality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 441 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800498</link>
      <description>Challenges to a demand based on limitation, jurisdiction, and the clubbing of different financial years require adjudication through the statutory appellate remedy where they raise disputed questions of fact and law. Writ jurisdiction was not used to determine the merits, and all legal issues remained open for appellate consideration. Protection against coercive action continued until the statutory appeal attained finality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>