<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 444 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800501</link>
    <description>Reasoned GST adjudication under section 73(9) requires meaningful consideration of the show-cause notice and the taxpayer&#039;s detailed reply, supported by cogent reasons. A cryptic order that fails to address those submissions reflects non-application of mind and is unsustainable without examination of the underlying tax demand. Fresh determination requires consideration of the reply and an adequate personal hearing, without expressing any view on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 444 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800501</link>
      <description>Reasoned GST adjudication under section 73(9) requires meaningful consideration of the show-cause notice and the taxpayer&#039;s detailed reply, supported by cogent reasons. A cryptic order that fails to address those submissions reflects non-application of mind and is unsustainable without examination of the underlying tax demand. Fresh determination requires consideration of the reply and an adequate personal hearing, without expressing any view on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>