<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 448 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800505</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging Orders-in-Original under the CGST Act raise the issue whether the statutory appellate remedy bars recourse to writ jurisdiction. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions and declined to interfere with the High Court judgments and orders. The reported position leaves those rulings on the availability of writ jurisdiction, despite an alternative statutory remedy, undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 448 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800505</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging Orders-in-Original under the CGST Act raise the issue whether the statutory appellate remedy bars recourse to writ jurisdiction. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions and declined to interfere with the High Court judgments and orders. The reported position leaves those rulings on the availability of writ jurisdiction, despite an alternative statutory remedy, undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>