<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54349</link>
    <description>Software supplied for a distributed control system was treated as exempt computer software because the excise notification contained no restrictive definition, and a customs-specific distinction could not be imported to narrow the exemption. The allegation of deliberate misdeclaration also failed because the department was already aware of the product nature and supporting technical material. Systems Engineering charges for site-based layout and installation work were held not includible in assessable value, as that activity was not shown to form part of manufacture. The duty demand and connected penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54349</link>
      <description>Software supplied for a distributed control system was treated as exempt computer software because the excise notification contained no restrictive definition, and a customs-specific distinction could not be imported to narrow the exemption. The allegation of deliberate misdeclaration also failed because the department was already aware of the product nature and supporting technical material. Systems Engineering charges for site-based layout and installation work were held not includible in assessable value, as that activity was not shown to form part of manufacture. The duty demand and connected penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>