<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2080 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472279</link>
    <description>Retrospective pay-fixation claims arising from a common pay-scale anomaly may involve a recurring cause of action, reducing the force of limitation and laches objections where corrective recommendations and comparable implementation occurred shortly before relief was sought. Similarly situated Customs and Central Excise officers should receive uniform correction where equivalent employees obtained revised scales and a common anomaly has been resolved. Denial solely because an employee did not participate in earlier proceedings conflicts with equality before law. Common pay-anomaly determinations are treated as judgments in rem, supporting notional revised-scale fixation from 1 January 1996 and actual benefits from 21 April 2004, with consequential arrears.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2080 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472279</link>
      <description>Retrospective pay-fixation claims arising from a common pay-scale anomaly may involve a recurring cause of action, reducing the force of limitation and laches objections where corrective recommendations and comparable implementation occurred shortly before relief was sought. Similarly situated Customs and Central Excise officers should receive uniform correction where equivalent employees obtained revised scales and a common anomaly has been resolved. Denial solely because an employee did not participate in earlier proceedings conflicts with equality before law. Common pay-anomaly determinations are treated as judgments in rem, supporting notional revised-scale fixation from 1 January 1996 and actual benefits from 21 April 2004, with consequential arrears.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>