<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1790 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472260</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the statutory framework for an eligible assessee became the operative remedy after the petitioner opted to pursue reassessment. The pending writ challenges required no further adjudication because a related order had already addressed the available course of action. The petitioner retained liberty to pursue the remedy in accordance with that related order, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1790 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472260</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the statutory framework for an eligible assessee became the operative remedy after the petitioner opted to pursue reassessment. The pending writ challenges required no further adjudication because a related order had already addressed the available course of action. The petitioner retained liberty to pursue the remedy in accordance with that related order, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>