<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 377 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800434</link>
    <description>GST adjudication was set aside and remitted for fresh consideration because relevant materials had not been produced before the adjudicating authority. The taxpayer must receive an adequate opportunity to submit its reply and supporting documents, enabling the authority to reconsider the matter on a complete factual record. The remand addresses the inability to place relevant material during the original adjudication rather than determining the substantive GST liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 377 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800434</link>
      <description>GST adjudication was set aside and remitted for fresh consideration because relevant materials had not been produced before the adjudicating authority. The taxpayer must receive an adequate opportunity to submit its reply and supporting documents, enabling the authority to reconsider the matter on a complete factual record. The remand addresses the inability to place relevant material during the original adjudication rather than determining the substantive GST liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>