<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 380 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800437</link>
    <description>Section 75(4) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 requires a personal hearing whenever an adverse decision against a taxable person is contemplated, even if no separate request for hearing was made. An assessment order imposing tax and penalty without that opportunity is invalid. The assessment order was quashed, while the Department retained liberty to issue a fresh order after granting a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 380 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800437</link>
      <description>Section 75(4) of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 requires a personal hearing whenever an adverse decision against a taxable person is contemplated, even if no separate request for hearing was made. An assessment order imposing tax and penalty without that opportunity is invalid. The assessment order was quashed, while the Department retained liberty to issue a fresh order after granting a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>