<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nexus between cash and proceeds of crime established through excise-evasion evidence and uncorroborated source claims.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104556</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment of cash as proceeds of crime requires a demonstrated nexus between the property and the scheduled offence. Evidence of a double-trip mechanism, supported by the truck driver&#039;s statement, showed excise-duty evasion through repeated use of transport documents. The warehouse owner did not independently corroborate the claimed bank withdrawal or receipts from traders; a cash book retained in the owner&#039;s custody lacked independent evidentiary value. The absence of bank records, investigative material, and increased declared income established the nexus between the seized cash and illicit country-liquor transactions, so the cash was treated as proceeds of crime and the attachment remained in force.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Nexus between cash and proceeds of crime established through excise-evasion evidence and uncorroborated source claims.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104556</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment of cash as proceeds of crime requires a demonstrated nexus between the property and the scheduled offence. Evidence of a double-trip mechanism, supported by the truck driver&#039;s statement, showed excise-duty evasion through repeated use of transport documents. The warehouse owner did not independently corroborate the claimed bank withdrawal or receipts from traders; a cash book retained in the owner&#039;s custody lacked independent evidentiary value. The absence of bank records, investigative material, and increased declared income established the nexus between the seized cash and illicit country-liquor transactions, so the cash was treated as proceeds of crime and the attachment remained in force.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>