<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2203 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472230</link>
    <description>Documented cash purchases of fruits supported by ledger accounts, sale invoices and bank-account extracts constitute explained business expenditure where the supplier dealings are regular, and corresponding receipts and transactions have been disclosed. Failure to give due cognisance to this evidence cannot sustain an addition for unexplained expenditure under Section 69C. The expenditure is treated as arising from disclosed business transactions rather than unexplained spending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 19:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2203 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472230</link>
      <description>Documented cash purchases of fruits supported by ledger accounts, sale invoices and bank-account extracts constitute explained business expenditure where the supplier dealings are regular, and corresponding receipts and transactions have been disclosed. Failure to give due cognisance to this evidence cannot sustain an addition for unexplained expenditure under Section 69C. The expenditure is treated as arising from disclosed business transactions rather than unexplained spending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>