<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1484 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472255</link>
    <description>Section 73(9) adjudication must comply with principles of natural justice by providing a reasonable and effective opportunity to answer a proposed demand. Fixing the deadline for a reply and the personal-hearing date on the same day denies that opportunity, preventing the affected person from properly presenting its case. Such a procedural defect vitiates the adjudication order and requires fresh adjudication after an adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 19:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1484 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472255</link>
      <description>Section 73(9) adjudication must comply with principles of natural justice by providing a reasonable and effective opportunity to answer a proposed demand. Fixing the deadline for a reply and the personal-hearing date on the same day denies that opportunity, preventing the affected person from properly presenting its case. Such a procedural defect vitiates the adjudication order and requires fresh adjudication after an adequate opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>