<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 321 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54322</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Commissioner&#039;s determination of the Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) was found to be final and binding on the party. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing that any challenge to the demand of duty based on the ACP was unsustainable. The judgment underscores the importance of complying with such determinations and the limitations on challenging consequential demands once they become final and binding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 321 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54322</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Commissioner&#039;s determination of the Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) was found to be final and binding on the party. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing that any challenge to the demand of duty based on the ACP was unsustainable. The judgment underscores the importance of complying with such determinations and the limitations on challenging consequential demands once they become final and binding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>