<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 290 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54315</link>
    <description>Plastic crates used to collect and shift machine outputs between stages of capacitor and resistor manufacture were treated as accessories of the machinery because they added to its convenience and effectiveness and aided the manufacturing process, even though the machinery could operate without them. On that basis, the crates qualified as capital goods under Rule 57AA and Modvat credit was admissible. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the credit therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 290 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54315</link>
      <description>Plastic crates used to collect and shift machine outputs between stages of capacitor and resistor manufacture were treated as accessories of the machinery because they added to its convenience and effectiveness and aided the manufacturing process, even though the machinery could operate without them. On that basis, the crates qualified as capital goods under Rule 57AA and Modvat credit was admissible. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the credit therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>