<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 287 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Dharmada charges should be included in the assessable value of goods, as they were collected in connection with the sale. The duty amount was to be recalculated based on treating invoice prices as cum-duty-price. The appeal was partly allowed for reworking the demand arising from the inclusion of Dharmada charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 287 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Dharmada charges should be included in the assessable value of goods, as they were collected in connection with the sale. The duty amount was to be recalculated based on treating invoice prices as cum-duty-price. The appeal was partly allowed for reworking the demand arising from the inclusion of Dharmada charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>