<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 286 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800343</link>
    <description>Reassessment requires income to have escaped assessment. Where a company validly adopted a 15-month first financial year under the Companies Act, 2013, and disclosed the entire income for that period in its assessment-year return, including the income targeted in reassessment proceedings, no income remained undisclosed or escaped. Reassessment is therefore impermissible where the proposed addition concerns income already returned for the valid first financial year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 286 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800343</link>
      <description>Reassessment requires income to have escaped assessment. Where a company validly adopted a 15-month first financial year under the Companies Act, 2013, and disclosed the entire income for that period in its assessment-year return, including the income targeted in reassessment proceedings, no income remained undisclosed or escaped. Reassessment is therefore impermissible where the proposed addition concerns income already returned for the valid first financial year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>