<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Electronic Cash Ledger Credits Do Not End Delayed GST Interest Until Debited Against Return Liability</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104539</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed GSTR-3B liabilities continues until the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited and the amount is credited to the electronic liability register; a cash-ledger credit alone is a deposit, not payment of an identified tax liability. The further proviso to Rule 88B(1), which excludes continuously available cash-ledger balances from interest computation, operates prospectively because it provides substantive relief without retrospective language. Failure to provide a requested personal hearing breaches Section 75(4), but does not require remand where no surviving prejudice, factual dispute, or unconsidered defence exists. A show-cause notice remains adequate where its basis was understood and fully answered without prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:13:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Electronic Cash Ledger Credits Do Not End Delayed GST Interest Until Debited Against Return Liability</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104539</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed GSTR-3B liabilities continues until the Electronic Cash Ledger is debited and the amount is credited to the electronic liability register; a cash-ledger credit alone is a deposit, not payment of an identified tax liability. The further proviso to Rule 88B(1), which excludes continuously available cash-ledger balances from interest computation, operates prospectively because it provides substantive relief without retrospective language. Failure to provide a requested personal hearing breaches Section 75(4), but does not require remand where no surviving prejudice, factual dispute, or unconsidered defence exists. A show-cause notice remains adequate where its basis was understood and fully answered without prejudice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:13:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>