<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 285 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54306</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals due to unsatisfactory explanation for the delay. The delay of about 800 days was attributed to winding up business and starting a new one, leading to dismissal of stay applications and appeals as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 285 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54306</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals due to unsatisfactory explanation for the delay. The delay of about 800 days was attributed to winding up business and starting a new one, leading to dismissal of stay applications and appeals as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>