<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2196 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472208</link>
    <description>Interest paid on unsecured loans from directors for business purposes is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) where no diversion of borrowed funds to non-business use is established. Expenditure specifically claimed under that provision cannot be disallowed under Section 37(1). An overdraft secured against a director&#039;s fixed deposits did not, on the relevant facts, establish a breach of deposit rules. The interest disallowance was therefore deleted and the expenditure allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 18:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2196 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472208</link>
      <description>Interest paid on unsecured loans from directors for business purposes is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) where no diversion of borrowed funds to non-business use is established. Expenditure specifically claimed under that provision cannot be disallowed under Section 37(1). An overdraft secured against a director&#039;s fixed deposits did not, on the relevant facts, establish a breach of deposit rules. The interest disallowance was therefore deleted and the expenditure allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>