<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 282 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; appeals by setting aside the penalties imposed, following the ratio of the cited judgments. The appeals were allowed to the extent of setting aside the penalties, and the impugned order was modified to that extent. The Tribunal did not address the reimbursement of the value of the goods due to the lack of a specific prayer for such relief in the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:45:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 282 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants&#039; appeals by setting aside the penalties imposed, following the ratio of the cited judgments. The appeals were allowed to the extent of setting aside the penalties, and the impugned order was modified to that extent. The Tribunal did not address the reimbursement of the value of the goods due to the lack of a specific prayer for such relief in the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>