https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800158 Article 226 judicial review examines the legality of a statutory authority's decision-making process and does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of a plausible disciplinary assessment based on the record. The Board's closure of the disciplinary complaint therefore remains undisturbed where no illegality, mala fides, or deliberate facilitation is established. Absence of a fiduciary or professional relationship does not itself exclude other misconduct, but is material where the prima facie opinion depends on the existence of that relationship. Pending criminal proceedings do not bar independent disciplinary jurisdiction; disciplinary action may proceed on the available evidence. en-us Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800158 Article 226 judicial review examines the legality of a statutory authority's decision-making process and does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of a plausible disciplinary assessment based on the record. The Board's closure of the disciplinary complaint therefore remains undisturbed where no illegality, mala fides, or deliberate facilitation is established. Absence of a fiduciary or professional relationship does not itself exclude other misconduct, but is material where the prima facie opinion depends on the existence of that relationship. Pending criminal proceedings do not bar independent disciplinary jurisdiction; disciplinary action may proceed on the available evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800158