https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800159 Recall of a merits order quashing issuance of process requires a cogent ground or identifiable infirmity; a complainant's absence at the final hearing alone is insufficient. Where the complaint has been adjudicated on the pleadings and record under the Negotiable Instruments Act provisions governing cheque dishonour and company liability, prior adjournments sought for the complainant and the absence of any demonstrated defect do not justify reopening the merits determination. Recall is therefore unwarranted. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800159 Recall of a merits order quashing issuance of process requires a cogent ground or identifiable infirmity; a complainant's absence at the final hearing alone is insufficient. Where the complaint has been adjudicated on the pleadings and record under the Negotiable Instruments Act provisions governing cheque dishonour and company liability, prior adjournments sought for the complainant and the absence of any demonstrated defect do not justify reopening the merits determination. Recall is therefore unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800159