https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800183 Interference with an order granting regular bail in a money-laundering matter is distinct from cancellation based on post-release misconduct or supervening circumstances. Appellate interference is justified only where the bail order is illegal, arbitrary, perverse, based on irrelevant material, or omits relevant considerations; detailed evaluation of evidence remains impermissible at the bail stage. Consideration of the absence of material linking the accused to proceeds of crime, completion of investigation, delayed trial prospects, and protective bail conditions can demonstrate application of the statutory twin conditions and general bail principles. Mere disagreement with that assessment does not justify setting aside bail. en-us Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800183 Interference with an order granting regular bail in a money-laundering matter is distinct from cancellation based on post-release misconduct or supervening circumstances. Appellate interference is justified only where the bail order is illegal, arbitrary, perverse, based on irrelevant material, or omits relevant considerations; detailed evaluation of evidence remains impermissible at the bail stage. Consideration of the absence of material linking the accused to proceeds of crime, completion of investigation, delayed trial prospects, and protective bail conditions can demonstrate application of the statutory twin conditions and general bail principles. Mere disagreement with that assessment does not justify setting aside bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800183