<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 133 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800190</link>
    <description>Approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code binds stakeholders under section 31(1) and extinguishes claims, including rehabilitation-policy and agreement-based liabilities, that are not provided for in the plan. Section 238 gives the Code precedence over inconsistent prior policies, agreements and arrangements, preventing enforcement of such unprovided liabilities against the corporate debtor or its successor. Eligibility for rehabilitation benefits under the 2002 policy depends on displaced-person status. In Article 226 proceedings, a fact-based administrative eligibility finding made after inquiry and hearing is not subject to appellate reappreciation unless apparent or jurisdictional error is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 133 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800190</link>
      <description>Approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code binds stakeholders under section 31(1) and extinguishes claims, including rehabilitation-policy and agreement-based liabilities, that are not provided for in the plan. Section 238 gives the Code precedence over inconsistent prior policies, agreements and arrangements, preventing enforcement of such unprovided liabilities against the corporate debtor or its successor. Eligibility for rehabilitation benefits under the 2002 policy depends on displaced-person status. In Article 226 proceedings, a fact-based administrative eligibility finding made after inquiry and hearing is not subject to appellate reappreciation unless apparent or jurisdictional error is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>