<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 154 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800211</link>
    <description>Documented share-sale transactions supported by allotment records, demat and bank statements, contract notes, and broker ledgers satisfy the initial burden to establish genuineness for unexplained cash-credit purposes unless cogent material links the taxpayer to penny-stock manipulation or an accommodation-entry scheme. General investigation material, without a taxpayer-specific nexus, cash trail, or identifying operator statement, cannot displace uncontroverted evidence; the human-probabilities test does not remove that requirement. An estimated unexplained-expenditure addition for alleged commission cannot stand where it rests solely on an unproved allegation that the underlying transaction was bogus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 154 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800211</link>
      <description>Documented share-sale transactions supported by allotment records, demat and bank statements, contract notes, and broker ledgers satisfy the initial burden to establish genuineness for unexplained cash-credit purposes unless cogent material links the taxpayer to penny-stock manipulation or an accommodation-entry scheme. General investigation material, without a taxpayer-specific nexus, cash trail, or identifying operator statement, cannot displace uncontroverted evidence; the human-probabilities test does not remove that requirement. An estimated unexplained-expenditure addition for alleged commission cannot stand where it rests solely on an unproved allegation that the underlying transaction was bogus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>