<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 186 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800243</link>
    <description>Government securities held by a bank as stock-in-trade may be valued at the lower of cost or market value under Section 145, and a consistently applied accounting and valuation method should not be displaced merely because another method is preferred; the related depreciation claim was allowable. A brokerage claim remained allowable after post-remand consideration. Section 41(1) applies only where a trading liability previously allowed as a deduction has been remitted or has ceased. Unclaimed customer balances were not taxable because the bank&#039;s continuing legal obligation to repay them precluded any remission or cessation of liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 186 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800243</link>
      <description>Government securities held by a bank as stock-in-trade may be valued at the lower of cost or market value under Section 145, and a consistently applied accounting and valuation method should not be displaced merely because another method is preferred; the related depreciation claim was allowable. A brokerage claim remained allowable after post-remand consideration. Section 41(1) applies only where a trading liability previously allowed as a deduction has been remitted or has ceased. Unclaimed customer balances were not taxable because the bank&#039;s continuing legal obligation to repay them precluded any remission or cessation of liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>