<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 202 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800259</link>
    <description>Monetary-limit policy for Revenue litigation before the High Court applied to appeals arising from revision proceedings; the claimed exception did not automatically require disregard of tax effect. Because the tax difference was substantially below the applicable policy threshold and the transactions showed no recurring or multiple disputes, the appeals were dismissed as below the monetary limit. The questions of law remained open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 202 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800259</link>
      <description>Monetary-limit policy for Revenue litigation before the High Court applied to appeals arising from revision proceedings; the claimed exception did not automatically require disregard of tax effect. Because the tax difference was substantially below the applicable policy threshold and the transactions showed no recurring or multiple disputes, the appeals were dismissed as below the monetary limit. The questions of law remained open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>