https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800274 Recovery of penalty solely because an e-way bill was not extended after expiry was treated as warranting intervention where delayed extension could be condoned. Recovery of a 200% penalty in those circumstances was considered inconsistent with principles of natural justice. Refund of the recovered penalty could be sought through an application to the proper officer, without a final determination on the merits of the penalty. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800274 Recovery of penalty solely because an e-way bill was not extended after expiry was treated as warranting intervention where delayed extension could be condoned. Recovery of a 200% penalty in those circumstances was considered inconsistent with principles of natural justice. Refund of the recovered penalty could be sought through an application to the proper officer, without a final determination on the merits of the penalty. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800274