<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800276</link>
    <description>Rule 86A(3) confines restrictions on utilisation of input tax credit in an electronic credit ledger to one year. A registered person may seek an order from the Commissioner under Rule 86A(2) after credit is blocked. Where that remedy has not been pursued, and registration cancellation and demand proceedings remain separately challengeable, no entitlement to mandamus relief for unblocking the credit is established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800276</link>
      <description>Rule 86A(3) confines restrictions on utilisation of input tax credit in an electronic credit ledger to one year. A registered person may seek an order from the Commissioner under Rule 86A(2) after credit is blocked. Where that remedy has not been pursued, and registration cancellation and demand proceedings remain separately challengeable, no entitlement to mandamus relief for unblocking the credit is established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>