<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 222 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800279</link>
    <description>GST registration cannot remain rejected solely for non-response to a Form GST REG-03 clarification notice where the applicant is granted a conditional opportunity to respond. The High Court quashed the rejection and remitted the registration application for fresh consideration on merits after hearing the applicant. The applicant must furnish the requested response within 30 days; otherwise, the authorities may proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 222 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800279</link>
      <description>GST registration cannot remain rejected solely for non-response to a Form GST REG-03 clarification notice where the applicant is granted a conditional opportunity to respond. The High Court quashed the rejection and remitted the registration application for fresh consideration on merits after hearing the applicant. The applicant must furnish the requested response within 30 days; otherwise, the authorities may proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>