https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800283 Alleged non-service of an adjudication order was considered in relation to access to the statutory appellate remedy after expiry of limitation. A prior deposit of 25% of disputed tax exceeded the appellate pre-deposit requirement, while knowledge of the order was claimed only when recovery proceedings commenced after the business changed location. An appeal was permitted within 30 days and was to be considered on merits without applying limitation. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800283 Alleged non-service of an adjudication order was considered in relation to access to the statutory appellate remedy after expiry of limitation. A prior deposit of 25% of disputed tax exceeded the appellate pre-deposit requirement, while knowledge of the order was claimed only when recovery proceedings commenced after the business changed location. An appeal was permitted within 30 days and was to be considered on merits without applying limitation. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800283