<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 229 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800286</link>
    <description>GST demand challenges requiring factual substantiation of fuelwood and charcoal exemption claims should proceed before the statutory appellate authority. The confirmed demand&#039;s partial recovery and need to clarify reliance on Form GSTR-8A require appellate examination. Liberty was granted to file a statutory appeal within 30 days; the appeal is to be decided without reference to limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 229 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800286</link>
      <description>GST demand challenges requiring factual substantiation of fuelwood and charcoal exemption claims should proceed before the statutory appellate authority. The confirmed demand&#039;s partial recovery and need to clarify reliance on Form GSTR-8A require appellate examination. Liberty was granted to file a statutory appeal within 30 days; the appeal is to be decided without reference to limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>