<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 230 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800287</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was denied in alleged GST-fraud proceedings because the allegations concerned fraudulent GST transactions causing substantial loss to the public exchequer. The seriousness of the alleged economic offence, coupled with the applicant&#039;s involvement in multiple similar criminal matters, weighed against granting pre-arrest protection. These combined factors negated eligibility for anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 230 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800287</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was denied in alleged GST-fraud proceedings because the allegations concerned fraudulent GST transactions causing substantial loss to the public exchequer. The seriousness of the alleged economic offence, coupled with the applicant&#039;s involvement in multiple similar criminal matters, weighed against granting pre-arrest protection. These combined factors negated eligibility for anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>