<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2191 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472199</link>
    <description>Section 148A(b) requires a minimum seven-day period for an assessee to respond before a reassessment notice is issued. Allowing only five days breaches the mandatory hearing requirement, creates a substantive jurisdictional defect, and violates principles of natural justice. Participation in assessment proceedings does not cure that defect under sections 292B or 292BB. The section 148A(b) notice, ensuing section 148A(d) order, section 148 notice, and reassessment order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2191 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472199</link>
      <description>Section 148A(b) requires a minimum seven-day period for an assessee to respond before a reassessment notice is issued. Allowing only five days breaches the mandatory hearing requirement, creates a substantive jurisdictional defect, and violates principles of natural justice. Participation in assessment proceedings does not cure that defect under sections 292B or 292BB. The section 148A(b) notice, ensuing section 148A(d) order, section 148 notice, and reassessment order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>